Structured Settlement Income Streams Sell Like Hot Cakes 

At common law, the landowner’s duty to entrants depended on where they fell under the invitee, licensee or trespasser category. In the US, state laws enacted either narrow or widen the rule by abolishing the common law dichotomy dividing invitees and licensees. Today, landowners owe entrants a duty to exercise reasonable care bearing in mind the status of the premises or acts or omissions arising. Intentional torts impose a stricter duty on landowners to trespassers to abstain from willfully and wantonly inflicting personal injury. A duty of reasonable care suffices where the owner knows of intrusion by a class of intruders such as children who may not appreciate the dangerous condition. States have conflicted interpretation on the scope of the duty of care on common touchstones of negligence.

Shawn Lee died of an electrocution by hidden current connecting rails for electric trains when he stranded to a restricted area to pass water while dead drunk. The Lees instituted a lawsuit for negligence hinged on landowner’s liability and got a settlement. Khan, Lee’s son, became the recipient of a stream of income to devolve his minor compensation in a structured settlement. Unlike lottery winners, tort claimants such as Khan collect their compensatory damages in cycles at a future date to avoid dissipation at an early age. Future cash flows locked in an illiquid structured settlement are not always as nice as ninepence. It cannot be perfected as a security or readily translatable into a lump sum payment. However, this does not mean his structured settlement payments due are not worth a plug nickel. In today’s challenging economic world, Khan took the bull by the horns and sold a portion of his structured settlement payments for a lump sum award.

Sell Structured Settlement

Duties of the Seller-Khan Had to Comply With Statutory Provisions to Facilitate Court Approval

Although structured settlement buying companies, Khan had to respect the state’s legal requirements before selling. Sellers have a duty to shop around for the highest possible price offers on the market by comparing the discount rates charged by factoring companies. The court will approve transactions where the seller scouted the marketplace. Khan had to execute the transfer agreement, swear an affidavit providing grounds for the sale and later appeared in court for a testimony. Due to the need to adhere to more stringent policies, courts may require disclosure of all previous transfer of payment rights under Khan’s structured settlement annuity.

In A Cluttered Market, How Did Khan Figure Out His Pick?

The secondary market for structured settlements red in tooth and claw competition amongst factoring companies has led to a nosedive in discount rates, transfer expenses, customer-friendly servicing and so forth. A cursory quest using search engines throws up a bevy of structured settlement funding companies. Khan foraged for information about Woodbridge, status at the Better Business Bureau. Khan had experienced the lengthy court processes; he requested for a quick turnaround and counter checked the price offer before receiving contractual documents.

How Did the Factoring Company Twist the Judge’s Arm to Approve Khan’s Deal?

Once structured settlement annuity buyers file a petition in court, they toe the line by adhering to all procedural requisites. For instance, Woodbridge served the annuity issuer and other interested parties twenty days before the court hearing. Khan received legally-mandated documents, including a disclosure statement, commendation to a professional advisor and gave him a “cooling off” window. The discount rate applied in his transaction, lump sum payment compared with the discounted present value and transfer expenses passed muster as fair and reasonable. Khan’s affidavit conveyed economic hardships which he later reiterated before the judge. Accordingly, the transfer agreement got a final order, and Khan’s money rolled in after a couple of days.

How Much Do You Pay for Legal Costs?

Jim had to pay legal fees totaling $2,000 for document compilation, law research, court appearance and oral submissions, and other requirements of the judicial process. However, the amount is not subsumed in the discount rate. The courts will only approve legal costs in line with the attorney remuneration code applicable in your state.

Structured Settlement Purchasing Companies on the Cutting Edge

Fairfield Funding has a customer representative who can leaf through your annuity and render guidance in court, deploys attorneys to argue the application before the judge and disburses payment on time. As a renowned buyer of annuities with foothold across all states in the US, they give sellers a means to tweak illiquid cash flows.

With Stone Street Capital, selling structured settlements, lottery winnings, or pensions is a piece of cake. You will only need to fill in and sign handful papers, and the ball is in their court. They will file a petition in your county and get into gear for the judge to sign off within the shortest duration.


Fundfirst Capital